The Simple..
Imagine trying to organize a party where every guest is talking to every other guest at the same time. It’s chaotic! Now, imagine this same situation in your database. This is what happens with many-to-many relationships: lots of messy connections, no clarity, and things get confusing fast.
But just like a party can have better flow with a host guiding the conversation, a link table can bring order to your data. Let’s dive into what a many-to-many relationship is, why it’s a problem, and how you can fix it.
Problem Highlights
If you use PowerBI, then you know what following images are –
Solution Highlights:
Before Link Table (Many to Many)
- The relationship between Students and Courses was direct, with many-to-many connections. Power BI had trouble handling this complexity, leading to inaccurate reports.
After Link Table (One to Many)
- By introducing the Enrollments link table, the relationship becomes one-to-many between Students → Enrollments and Courses → Enrollments, solving the issue and making reporting easy.
Here, have you noticed Student_ID and Course_ID are defined as PKs?
This is the beauty of optimized RDBMS. No redundancies, proper relationship, no issues at all.
What is a Many-to-Many Relationship, and why it cause problem in RDBMS?
In a many-to-many (M:N) relationship, one record in Table A can be associated with multiple records in Table B, and vice versa. For example:
- A student can enroll in multiple courses.
- A course can have multiple students enrolled.
This creates an M:N relationship between the students and courses. Here’s what it looks like.
Issues with M: N relationship (i.e Without Link Table)
Students Table (with repeating Course_IDs):
Student ID | Student Name | Course ID |
---|---|---|
1 | Alice | 101 |
1 | Alice | 102 |
2 | Bob | 101 |
2 | Bob | 103 |
3 | Charlie | 102 |
Courses Table (with repeating Student_IDs):
Course_ID | Course_Name | Student_ID |
---|---|---|
101 | Math | 1 |
101 | Math | 2 |
102 | Science | 1 |
102 | Science | 3 |
103 | History | 2 |
Issues:
- Data Redundancy: Repeating IDs leads to more rows and inefficient data handling.
- Complex Queries: Managing repeated IDs in both tables complicates SQL queries and Power BI relationships.
- Power BI Ambiguity: Power BI struggles with accurate calculations, often leading to incorrect totals.
The Solution: Using a Link Table (aka Junction Table/ Join Table/ Bridge Table)
To fix this, we create a link table that connects the Student_IDs and Course_IDs. This eliminates the need to repeat IDs in both tables and simplifies the model.
Enrollments Table (Link Table):
Student_ID | Course_ID |
---|---|
1 | 101 |
1 | 102 |
2 | 101 |
2 | 103 |
3 | 102 |
After Link Table:
- Students Table: Student_ID Student_Name 1 Alice 2 Bob 3 Charlie
- Courses Table: Course_ID Course_Name 101 Math 102 Science 103 History
Power BI Benefits:
- Clear Relationships: Now, Students and Courses are connected through the Enrollments link table, making it easier for Power BI to understand the relationships.
- Accurate Reporting: Power BI can now correctly calculate metrics like “Total Students per Course” or “Courses per Student” without ambiguity.
- Simplified Data Model: Cleaner relationships reduce query complexity and enhance performance.
Key Takeaways for Power BI:
- Link tables break down many-to-many relationships into one-to-many connections, simplifying data models.
- They improve Power BI performance, allowing for more accurate aggregations and reports.
- Always use a link/junction table when handling many-to-many relationships for cleaner and more efficient data models.
Resources and Codes
Tool I used to develop data model:
Table Students {
Student_ID integer [primary key]
Student_Name varchar
}
Table Courses {
Course_ID integer [primary key]
Course_Name varchar
}
Table Enrollments {
Student_ID varchar
Course_ID integer
}
Ref: Students.Student_ID < Enrollments.Student_ID // many-to-one
Ref: Courses.Course_ID < Enrollments.Course_ID // many-to-one
Discover more from Data Engineer Journey
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.